The Transport Committee will investigate ways to help limit the damage and disruption to England’s roads and pavements that work carried out by utility companies can have.
In a new inquiry, the cross-party Committee will examine how better management, regulation and enforcement could benefit both road users – including cyclists and pedestrians – and the local authorities charged with maintaining road surface quality and overseeing traffic flows.
MPs will look into the effectiveness of issuing fines to utility companies that mismanage their street works, and of the inspection scheme that was introduced in 2023.
They will also scrutinise the system of local authorities’ renting road lanes out to utility companies and to what extent this incentivises timely completion of street works, as well as scrutinising other potential examples of best practice such as coordinating works between utility companies.
Chair of the Transport Committee Ruth Cadbury said: ”There’s nothing like having your journey delayed by road works, especially when they seem to take far longer than needed to complete. But often it’s excavations by utility companies rather than road maintenance that are the cause.
“Today the Transport Committee launches an inquiry that will investigate how street works can best be managed to minimise disruption and damage to roads and traffic, and be better coordinated. The Committee now welcomes written evidence submissions that will help us ask the right questions and get the best answers.”
The Committee now welcomes written evidence submissions that respond to the following terms of reference for the inquiry. Submissions should be made via the Committee’s website by 11.59 on 21 January 2025.
a. The effect of utility works on road and pavement surface quality and on maintenance needs and costs, and how local authorities can manage this.
b. Whether local authorities have sufficient powers and resources to manage the effect of street works on congestion, travel disruption, pavement access and accessibility.
c. The effectiveness of processes for notification of works and obtaining permits, including the classification of emergency works and opportunities for coordinated works, and what makes for a good working relationship between utility companies and highway authorities.
d. Whether fines are a sufficient deterrent to poor practice, whether other enforcement mechanisms would work better, and whether the inspections regime introduced in 2023 has improved the quality of reinstatement works.
e. Whether lane rental is a successful model, the potential merits of making it available in more areas, and what other tools or best practices could be more widely adopted.
PIC-.GOV.UK
