Jenoptik says research suggests enforcement is vital to deliver 20 mph benefits

The traffic enforcement specialist Jenoptik has commented that a new study into the effectiveness of 20 mile per hour limits proves that it takes more changing signs to ensure the lower limits deliver what they are designed to do.

Analysis of three years’ data by Queen’s University Belfast concluded that introducing a city centre 20 mph limit had little impact on long-term outcomes including road traffic collisions, casualties and speed, except for a reduction in traffic volume.  The researchers said that planners should consider enforcement in their designs.

Traditionally the thinking among traffic engineers and the police is that 20 mph-limit roads should be managed using interventions such as speed humps and traffic islands.  However, such interventions are often unpopular with residents and drivers alike, causing damage to vehicles and increased noise and pollution as cars brake and speed up or ‘thump-thump’ over speed humps.  The surge in SUV sales in cities in recent years is often seen as a reaction to the proliferation of speed humps and cushions in urban areas, enabling drivers to ride out the bumps rather than slowing down, as intended.

Jenoptik has been behind a camera-enforced scheme on a network in Plymouth which has bucked the trend of engineering-based interventions, following calls from people who lived there who objected to proposed speed humps on their residential streets.  Instead, a series of average and spot speed camera enforcement cameras were used.

Local reports suggest these have been very popular with residents.

“I read the Queen’s University Report with interest, and it confirmed to me what I have long suspected that a formal enforcement regime is the best way to lock in the benefits of introducing 20 mph limits,” commented Account Manager Timo Thornton of Jenoptik.  “The scheme we introduced in Plymouth was not only interesting because it was a UK first, utilising both average and spot speed cameras on the route, but also because it was demanded by residents.  This puts pay to the idea that speed cameras are unpopular – they are a fair and efficient way to deliver the behavioural change you need to make our residential streets safer.”

Initial testing at the site in Plymouth showed how vital the cameras are, with more than a hundred offences per hour during the initial testing period, before enforcement began.  This is therefore seen as a pilot site for the region and could lead to enforcement of other 20 mile per hour zones across the south west.

(Picture – Jenoptik)


Related Stories


All the latest highways news direct to your inbox every week day

Subscribe now

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.