Thatcham Research and Euro NCAP are encouraged by the results of their latest Assisted Driving Gradings, which show all seven of the mainstream vehicle manufacturers whose cars were tested, are committed to fitting robust Assisted Driving technology at every price point.
Thatcham Research and Euro NCAP’s world-first Assisted Driving Grading assessments were introduced in October 2020 and are designed to support the sensible marketing and safe adoption of Assisted Driving technology.
Seven new cars were assessed during the latest tests. Five of them were pure Electric Vehicles (EVs), reflecting the increasing popularity of this type of vehicle within the new car market.
Each car was evaluated and rated for the level of assistance, level of driver engagement and effectiveness of the safety back-up offered by their Assisted Driving systems. The best systems strike a good balance between the amount of assistance provided and how much they do to ensure drivers are engaged and aware of their responsibilities behind the wheel.
Matthew Avery, Thatcham Research’s Chief Strategic Research Officer, said: “Assisted Driving technology can be a great comfort feature, especially when supporting drivers on long motorway journeys. But it must strike the right balance between offering a meaningful level of assistance and ensuring that motorists don’t sit back and let the system do the driving. We’ve seen the dangerous outcomes on roads around the world when drivers become convinced that their role is secondary.”
Last year’s Assisted Driving Grading results prompted Thatcham Research to raise concerns that some carmakers were overselling the supposed self-driving capability of their technology. The naming, marketing and performance of Tesla’s ‘Autopilot’ system was highlighted as a concern.
Reassuringly, the capability of all the cars in this year’s assessments is being described correctly and consumers are not being led to believe they are driving a car equipped with Automated functionality.
Avery said: “All seven cars we’ve just tested are clearly marketed as having ‘driver assistance’ functions, not ‘automated’. These systems are engineered to involve and support the driver in a very cooperative manner. They’re certainly not trying to offer automation, where the driving task can be relinquished to the vehicle, and we strongly believe that’s the right thing to do.”
BMW’s iX3 emerged as the top performer, scoring 169 points (out of a possible 200) and earning a ‘very good’ grading, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E (152 points) and Cupra Formentor (144 points) both secured a ‘good’ grading.
The all-electric Polestar 2 (135 points) and Hyundai Ioniq 5 (126 points) earned a ‘moderate’ grading, while the less expensive Toyota Yaris (109 points) and Vauxhall Mokka-e (101 points) were both handed an ‘entry’ grading for the solid core performance of their Assisted Driving technology.
“These encouraging results reveal solid system performance across a good spread of new vehicles, and the fact that five of the seven cars are full EVs is also positive. It shows the newest cars in this growing sector are being equipped with Assisted Driving technology that delivers comfort and safety benefits to drivers,” Avery explained.
Matthew Avery’s car-by-car analysis:
“Our top performing vehicle is the BMW iX3 which is a premium, battery electric SUV. It’s the only vehicle to get our ‘very good’ grading. It responded well in our collision avoidance scenarios and at 85%, it has one of the highest scores for Driver Engagement, in part because the iX3 features good in-vehicle video to show the driver how to use the system.”
Ford Mustang Mach-E
“Ford’s battery electric Mustang Mach-E achieved a ‘good’ grading. It’s got a very good Safety Backup system which scored 83%, and it has generally well-balanced Assisted Driving functionality. However, we do think the name of ‘Co-Pilot 360’ is a little ambiguous and doesn’t adequately describe the fact it’s an Assisted Driving system that always requires the driver to be in control.”
“The Cupra Formentor is a petrol-powered vehicle with a plug-in option and receives a ‘good’ grading. The ‘Travel Assist’ name accurately portrays the role of the system, which has well-balanced Driver Engagement, Vehicle Assistance and Safety Backup features. A good option in the market.”
“The Polestar 2 is another full battery electric vehicle and it gets a ‘moderate’ grading. It has an incredibly good score of 85% for its Safety Backup, something you’d expect from a Volvo-derived vehicle. But it’s let down by its Vehicle Assistance score which is just 50%, because the system cannot adapt its speed for curves and junctions. This vehicle is capable of Over the Air updates so we hope Polestar will improve that functionality for all its drivers soon.”
Hyundai Ioniq 5
“The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a brand-new, fully electric car and it achieves a ‘moderate’ score. It has good Vehicle Assistance and good Driver Engagement. But it’s let down by its Safety Backup score of 50%. This means the car is less capable at supporting the driver in an emergency.”
“Toyota’s Yaris gets an ‘entry’ rating, but it’s impressive to see Assisted Driving functionality on a low-cost super mini like this. However, it’s let down by its comparatively poor performing Vehicle Assistance and Safety Backup functions.”
“The Mokka-e is the fifth battery electric vehicle in this year’s assessments, but it’s also a low cost one. It receives an ‘entry’ grading because its Speed Assistance system only uses a camera. This means the information the driver is receiving from the system may not always be reliable.”
Today’s Assisted Driving technologies give support to the driver. And although they are providing the foundations for tomorrow’s Automated Driving technologies, they cannot be classified as ‘Automated’ yet.
At the heart of an effective Assisted Driving system should always be a good balance between Driver Engagement, Vehicle Assistance and Safety Back-up[i].
Although Thatcham Research views the results of its latest Assisted Driving Grading assessments as a positive step along the road to Automation, the ‘moderate’ rating achieved by the Polestar 2 shows that this technology is still nascent.
The Polestar 2 achieved an impressive 85% for Safety Back-up and a solid 70% for Driver Engagement, but it was the lowest scorer – at 50% – of all the cars tested for Vehicle Assistance. It’s speed assistance function in particular was highlighted as an area that needs improvement by test engineers.
“The Polestar 2 is really impressive in an emergency, almost equal to the BMW in terms of its Safety Back-up score. But its assistance score holds it back overall,” Avery pointed out. “Finding that sweet spot in terms of system balance is a challenge that carmakers continue to face.”
Although its current assessments focus on testing today’s Assisted Driving technology, Thatcham Research and UK government organisation Zenzic are already working in partnership on a safety rating scheme for Automated Driving Systems. The intention is that this will become the benchmark for a global independent rating scheme for Automated Driving Systems, with a view to driving best practice and reassuring consumers that – when the technology is mature enough – it’s safe to hand over control.
(Picture – Thatcham)